Christ Above All

Agoraphobia “is an anxiety disorder characterized by anxiety in situations where the sufferer perceives certain environments as dangerous or uncomfortable.” (Wikipedia)

I actually knew a man who suffered from agoraphobia when I was much younger. He never ventured more than two blocks from his home to his place of employment until one evening a series of events forced him to travel several miles beyond his perceived limits. It was this unplanned experience that helped him move beyond perception to reality – the rest of the world is not necessarily immediately dangerous or uncomfortable.

Fellowship Agoraphobia

I have observed many in the body of Christ who appear to suffer from what we might call a “fellowship agoraphobia.” Fellowship (koinonia) in the New Testament refers to deep partnerships that are akin to marriage or joint business relationships. In the Christian context, fellowship is a spiritual partnership that involves a sharing of the spiritual life believers jointly possess in Christ. Some hesitate to enter into such a shared community life because they believe the relationship to be dangerous to their privacy or at the very least, uncomfortable. This fellowship agoraphobia keeps other believers at an unhealthy distance.

The Necessity of Body Life

The body of Christ is made up of members that are inextricably united to one another as a result of our spiritual communion with the Father, Son and Holy Spirit through our union with Christ. God’s grace flows through each of us to one another. This occurs when one or more of us “speaks the truth in love” to one another. This might take place in a public context or in a very private and personal setting. God’s transforming grace also flows to others when we serve one another with our various spiritual gifts or endowments. But each and every case will involve purposeful interaction with one another – i.e., relationships and some degree of transparency.

But relationships can become very messy. Not everyone is as easy to get along with as others. Not everyone is as welcoming of the loving concern of others. Not everyone likes to “air their dirty laundry” and disclose their need of someone or something. We are surrounded by a culture built upon a spirit of independence and self-sufficiency. There is a lot of good to be found in this American ideal. But it is not entirely biblical through and through. God has designed us for community. He has designed the individual members of the body to NEED one another so as to reflect the inner-relationships of the Holy Trinity.

Take a Step – Give a Nudge

Many in the body of Christ are not sufficiently convinced of the necessity of deep fellowship and will require a nudge to encourage them. The author of Hebrews tells believers to “not neglect our meeting together” but to be sure to “consider how to stir one another to love and good works” and “encourage one another.”

Where are you in respect to true Christian fellowship? Let me urge those on the fringe to take a step towards this level of community and those already experiencing community to nudge the others along. God’s family can feel uncomfortable at times, as with any family, but its through this very vehicle of interdependent relationships that God’s grace transforms people into the image of His beloved Son.

Obviously I have been remiss in posting to this blog. The pace of ministry accelerated like a high speed train following the T4G conference right on up and through Easter (Resurrection) Sunday. Thanks especially to all who visit from our congregation who have come looking for reflections pertinent to our life together and thanks also to friends who have stopped by. 

“In Jesus Christ we have been chosen from eternity, accepted in time, and united for eternity.” Dietrich Bonhoeffer

In Ephesians 1 the apostle Paul states that all Christians have been blessed by God with “every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places” – IN CHRIST. This little formula “in Christ” is something that Paul utilizes in one form or another 164 times in his letters. From Paul’s perspective Jesus is the source of every blessing given to believers in what we commonly call our “salvation” and all that is His becomes ours when were are united to Him or, as Paul states, placed “in Christ.” This is referred to by theologians as the doctrine of “union with Christ.”

Chosen from Eternity

Bonhoeffer’s quote reminds us that God’s saving grace reaches back into eternity past. And this blessing, God’s election of the people He would give to His Son, also takes place “in Christ.” Paul writes “He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world” (Eph. 1:4). In other words, before we were experientially united to Christ through the new birth in time and space, the Father contemplated believers redemptively as being in or belonging to His Son. Much like some cultures where those who are betrothed to one another in an arranged marriage are seen as already belonging to their spouse.

Accepted in Time

These blessings become the believer’s experientially when he/she is united to Jesus by God’s act of saving grace. As Paul puts it a little later in Ephesians 2, even while we were spiritually dead in our transgressions and sin it is God who “made us alive together with him.” This is a reference to regeneration or the new birth. Paul appears to have coined this compound verb as there is no evidence of this in any extant extra biblical documents. The apostle knits together  the components: made alive – together with – him in order to depict the transformation of the new birth that involves nothing less than resurrection life – the dead become alive when joined to He who alone gives life (cf. Col. 2:13).

It is then that our union with Christ confers all the benefits of His perfect and glorious salvation. We are guilty sinners who need righteousness – in Christ we are justified because He is our righteousness (1 Cor. 1:30). We are lost in a sea of fallen human beings – in Christ we are sanctified (set apart) because He is our sanctification (1 Cor. 1:30). We are outside the heavenly family devoid of an inheritance – in Christ we are adopted sons for He is the Son par excellence (Eph. 1:14; Rom. 8:15).

United for Eternity

So many of our human unions end in separation. While it is difficult, if not next to impossible, to calculate the true mortality rate of marriages in America (its not as simple as counting marriages and divorces in any given year), it is clear that most of us have been touched by divorce at one point or another. But our union with Christ is an unbreakable and indissoluble marriage. It was designed in eternity past, realized in time and held together forever by God’s grace. The reason for this permanence lies in the fact that all that is needed for our salvation, including its permanence, lies “in Christ.” He is the unchanging and unfailing groom. He has loved us with an unending and unfailing love. Even when we are faithless, He “remains faithful, for He cannot deny Himself” (2 Tim. 2:13).

“I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of my hand.” John 10:28

Unashamed of the Gospel

Day two was a day full of preaching, panels, breakout sessions and worship. It spanned from 9 am to 10 pm. In the words of Matt Chandler (speaker for the last of three plenary sessions), today was “kid day.” He was humorously referring to the fact that the first plenary message was delivered by Kevin DeYoung (no pun intended here), the second by David Platt, both of whom join Matt as some of the younger voices of what is being called the “New Calvinism.” Waiting in the batter’s box were John Piper, Ligon Duncan and John MacArthur, three of the more, shall we say, “seasoned” heralds of our time. I suppose that means tomorrow will be “grown-up day.”

It is worth noting that while this younger generation of preachers may have a less formal tenor in the pulpit than the previous generation, when the word is handled with integrity it can have power and divine effectiveness due to the faithful ministry of the Holy Spirit. Kevin preaches in a manner deliberate, textual and closer to what we will hear on “grown-up day” but sprinkled with a few nods to pop-culture (that’s iota not “Yoda”). While Matt and David preach with more youthful angst, informality and a gritty “emo” like emotion that appears to me to be common among many of the newer Calvinists. What matters is that each is a vessel of the Lord – merely clay pots through whom God must choose to do His work.

“I planted, Apollos watered, but God caused the growth” (1 Cor. 3:6)

Whether one enters the pulpit as a gritty Amos (the only prophet who was formerly a “fig-picker) or an erudite Paul, in the end, its not the T-shirt and grit nor the suit and composure that will determine the extent of divine effects in those sitting under the preached word. There must be respect and confidence in the infallible and sufficient word of God as evidenced in a faithful Christ-exalting exposition of the text. That’s all we can do (along with pleading prayer – hear David Platt’s message). God must choose to magnify His glory by infusing the preaching event with His divine blessing. Oh, may He do so in all our pulpits. Well, enough of my own thoughts. Suffice to say, it encourages me and glorifies God when he uses a faithful Amos and a faithful Paul in such close proximity. 

Day-Two Takeaways

(These aren’t always exact quotes as I’m typing on my iPhone of all things as fast as I can. They do, however, capture the essence)

“If you think that you can magnify grace by shrinking truth you make them (listeners) blind to both.” Kevin DeYoung. What a temptation – make God seem more “gracious” (in a truly unbiblical sense) by softening the rough edges of divine truth. In the end, you end up with neither grace nor truth. Be bold with ALL the truth – I reminded myself.

“Am I pleading for God’s mercy upon sinners?” – David Platt.  I was disturbed by my capacity to not palpably feel the horror that awaits unbelievers. My pleading may not alter the Lamb’s book of life but it is part of the fabric of God’s sovereign method of grace in redeeming the elect.

Panel Discussion: The morning’s panel discussion focused on the doctrine of progressive sanctification and the necessity of holiness. This is a topic I teach at the Cornerstone Seminary and one dear to my heart. In this panel John Piper stated that “glorification is conditional” (that is an exact quote). The panel was addressing the apparent lack of interest (to put it mildly) that some of the newer Calvinists have in the necessity of personal effort in the pursuit of holiness. If one speaks of this, it was noted, you may be labeled “legalist.”

Now, we Reformed types major on the essential truth that salvation is all of grace and all of the Lord. It’s easy to hear a statement like Piper’s and take it out of context. He did not say “justification is conditional.” Though, that itself would be true – ONLY in this sense – Christ has MET all the conditions on my behalf. But, glorification is the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow of salvation and this blessing of God is given to all believers who have persevered and borne the fruit of justification (i.e., progressive sanctification or practical holiness). In other words – true believers. The nuance here is that these “works” are NOT meritorious but evidential. The panel did not state it exactly in these terms but I believe this was their target conceptually. It is a conversation worth listening to and one which will continue to disturb the church. Let’s face it, it’s difficult to maintain the balance between law and grace and positional and progressive sanctification in your own conscience and a local church – let alone everyone else’s books.

On the Lighter Side

Am I getting started to soon?

We walked to the Louisville Slugger factory during break and I bought three mini-bats for each of my three grandsons. I had all of them engraved. As Grandpa it’s now my right and privilege to do stuff like this. I dare you to stop me. P.S. I’m keeping the BIG one!

TR’s Bat

It Sure Looks Like Solid Ground

According to the Oxford dictionary one of the meanings of speculation is “the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence.” 

Theories can often serve the process of interpreting Scripture as one sifts through the data and weighs the possible meanings of a text. A theory presents a possibility that can be examined from many angles until it is demonstrated to be either the best possible interpretation with the least problems or an unacceptable interpretation in light of the evidence and rules of interpretation. In other words, a theory is like a model one can fabricate, hold in your hands and test before investing in building the real thing.

All theories in biblical interpretation and theology must be thoroughly evaluated and the goal is always to seek more and better evidence to support it. But speculation is forming a theory without firm evidence. The question is whether one should then take the next step and make decisions upon the ground of speculation. This, to me, seems to go against the better part of wisdom and is akin to building on top of sand without an engineering report with the hope  that the ground won’t shift.

Speculating on “Fallible Prophecy” 

The now widespread belief in “fallible prophecy” involves just such conjecture. What part of the prophecy is from God and what part isn’t? How much did the fallible prophet get wrong? One might form an opinion but that will always amount to conjecture because there is no real way of knowing and hence testing prophecies that are not dealing with direct scriptural or doctrinal claims. Nor is there any way to determine the degree of mixture as to the source.

Prophecies about relationships, jobs, financial decisions, etc., may be weighed against biblical principles in regards to their wisdom but the percentage of purity cannot be traced. How do you know God told you this? Proving the unverifiable is impossible. One cannot have real and absolute assurance because that’s the definition of fallibility – you can be wrong!

Speculating about tomorrow’s weather is one thing but speculating about what percentage of a “prophecy” is from God and what part the prophet got wrong is something altogether different.  And yet people make choices every day on the basis of fallible prophecy. 

Wandering from Green Pastures

This is a dangerous, lamentable and often destructive way to live the Christian life. Sometimes very directly, as in decisions to leave careers or sell homes because of a “prophecy.” But there is also the quiet almost imperceivable drift away from the solid ground of God’s all-sufficient word. Like many forms of mysticism, confidence in fallible prophecy casts doubt on the adequacy of Scripture (2 Tim. 3:16). I’ve seen too many well-meaning Christians, to quote J. I. Packer, “Wandering out of the green pastures of God’s word into the barren flats of human speculation.” The pastures of God’s word are green with nourishment because they bring us into contact with the all-sufficient Christ. In Him are hidden “all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Col. 2:3).

The slow prayerful process of sanctified reasoning with the truth of Scripture may not be as direct and exhilarating as a prophecy that suddenly invades your life with an immediate word from the living God just for you, but it is based on a more solid foundation. Consider this beloved, you will still have to apply prayerful sanctified reason to the prophecy– after all it’s fallible. Now what would you rather prayerfully examine, meditate upon and consider– unverifiable fallible prophecy or the infallible word of the Lord that will stand forever?